What is the Difference Between Concerted and Sequential Model of Allosterism

The main difference between concerted and sequential model of allosterism is that in the concerted model, all subunits of an enzyme with multiple subunits change their conformation simultaneously, leading to a shift between two distinct states (Tense, T, and Relaxed, R), whereas the sequential model of allosterism proposes that conformational changes occur sequentially in individual subunits.

The concerted and sequential models of allosterism represent two fundamental approaches to understanding how proteins undergo structural changes in response to ligand binding.

Key Areas Covered

1. What is Concerted Model of Allosterism
      – Definition, Features, Applications
2. What is Sequential Model of Allosterism
      – Definition, Features, Applications 
3. Similarities Between Concerted and Sequential Model of Allosterism
      – Outline of Common Features
4. Difference Between Concerted and Sequential Model of Allosterism
      – Comparison of Key Differences
5. FAQ: Concerted and Sequential Model of Allosterism
      – Frequently Asked Questions

Key Terms

Concerted Model of Allosterism, Sequential Model of Allosterism

Difference Between Concerted and Sequential Model of Allosterism - Comparison Summary

What is Concerted Model Of Allosterism

The concerted model of allosterism is a conceptual framework that describes the regulation of enzyme activity through conformational changes involving all subunits simultaneously. Allosterism refers to the modulation of an enzyme’s activity by the binding of a regulatory molecule at a site distinct from the active site. Unlike the sequential model, which suggests independent conformational changes in individual subunits, the concerted model posits a synchronized transition of all subunits between distinct conformational states.

In the concerted model, all subunits of the enzyme exist in either a relaxed (R) or tense (T) state. These states are in dynamic equilibrium, and the binding of a ligand, such as a substrate or a regulatory molecule, shifts the equilibrium toward one state, influencing the entire enzyme complex. This cooperative behavior ensures that all subunits undergo conformational changes in a coordinated manner.

Concerted vs Sequential Models of Allosterism

One classic example illustrating the concerted model is the allosteric regulation of hemoglobin. In the absence of oxygen, hemoglobin tends to exist in the tense (T) state, making it less likely to bind oxygen. As oxygen molecules bind to one subunit, inducing a conformational change, the entire hemoglobin molecule shifts to the relaxed (R) state, promoting the binding of additional oxygen molecules. This cooperative binding and conformational transition optimize oxygen transport in the bloodstream.

The concerted model provides a robust explanation for the observed cooperativity in various allosteric enzymes. While it simplifies the understanding of allosteric regulation, it may oversimplify the complex dynamics occurring within large protein complexes. Nonetheless, the model remains a valuable theoretical framework for explaining the fundamental principles governing allosteric enzyme regulation.

What is Sequential Model of Allosterism

The sequential model of allosterism is a conceptual framework that elucidates the dynamic regulation of enzyme activity through conformational changes. Allosteric enzymes possess distinct binding sites for both substrate and effector molecules, and the sequential model describes how the binding of one ligand influences the affinity for another at a different site.

In this model, the enzyme exists in two distinct conformations: the tense (T) state and the relaxed (R) state. Initially, the enzyme adopts the T state, which has a lower affinity for substrates. When the first substrate molecule binds to an active site, it induces a conformational shift to the R state, enhancing the enzyme’s affinity for subsequent substrate molecules. This transition is often referred to as the “induced fit” mechanism, where the enzyme dynamically adjusts its structure to accommodate the substrate.

Compare Concerted and Sequential Models of Allosterism

Crucially, allosteric enzymes are sensitive to the binding of effector molecules at allosteric sites. These sites are distinct from the active site and can modulate the enzyme’s activity. The binding of an effector molecule stabilizes either the T or R state, influencing the enzyme’s ability to bind substrates. Positive effectors stabilize the R state, promoting substrate binding, while negative effectors stabilize the T state, inhibiting substrate binding.

A key feature of the sequential model is its portrayal of cooperativity. Cooperativity refers to the phenomenon where the binding of a ligand at one site influences the binding of additional ligands at other sites. Positive cooperativity occurs when substrate binding increases the affinity for subsequent substrates, while negative cooperativity decreases this affinity.

Similarities Between Concerted and Sequential Model of Allosterism

  • Both describe mechanisms of protein regulation.

Difference Between Concerted and Sequential Model of Allosterism

Definition

The concerted model of allosterism is a conceptual framework that describes the regulation of enzyme activity through conformational changes involving all subunits simultaneously. Meanwhile, the sequential model of allosterism is a conceptual framework that elucidates the dynamic regulation of enzyme activity through conformational changes.

Conformational Changes

In the concerted model, all subunits of the allosteric protein undergo conformational changes simultaneously, leading to a collective, concerted shift in the protein’s structure. However, in the sequential model, conformational changes occur sequentially, with one subunit influencing the next in a stepwise fashion. The transition from one state to another propagates through the protein one subunit at a time.

Cooperativity

The concerted model exhibits high cooperativity, meaning all subunits switch between states cooperatively, with a steep sigmoidal binding curve for ligand binding. On the other hand, the sequential model shows lower cooperativity, with a less steep binding curve. Subunits switch independently, and the binding of a ligand to one subunit affects the conformation of adjacent subunits.

Intermediates

Moreover, the concerted model typically lacks stable intermediates between conformational states. The transition is abrupt and synchronized. Sequential model may have stable intermediates between different conformational states, reflecting the stepwise nature of the transition.

FAQ: Concerted and Sequential Models of Allosterism

What are the two models of cooperative binding?

The two models of cooperative binding are the concerted model and the sequential model.

What is a feature of the concerted model?

One feature is that confirmation of all subunits changes simultaneously.

Conclusion

In the concerted model, all subunits of an enzyme with multiple subunits change their conformation simultaneously, leading to a shift between two distinct states (Tense, T, and Relaxed, R), whereas the sequential model of allosterism proposes that conformational changes occur sequentially in individual subunits. Thus, this is the main difference between concerted and sequential model of allosterism.

Reference:

1. “Allosteric Enzyme.” Byju’s.

Image Courtesy:

1. “Enzyme Model” By Tenthkrige (talk).Tenthkrige – Own work(Original text: I (Tenthkrige (talk)) created this work entirely by myself.) (CC0) via Commons Wikimedia
2. “KNF model” By Henry Jakubowski – Bio Libretexts (CC BY-SA 3.0) via Commons Wikimedia

About the Author: Hasini A

Hasini is a graduate of Applied Science with a strong background in forestry, environmental science, chemistry, and management science. She is an amateur photographer with a keen interest in exploring the wonders of nature and science.

Leave a Reply